Online reputation management
Online reputation management as applied SEO practice — pointed at Page 1 of your name search.
Twelve years of applied SEO discipline directed at reputation management for established professionals. The methodology is currently documented live on my own name — an unrelated individual with the same name whose viral news coverage dominates the “Matthew Kellogg” query. The reclamation runs in real time, with every stage independently verifiable.
Which type of reputation management is my focus?
Online reputation management is a broad category that describes many different types of strategies. My specialty is search engines and AI LLMs where SERM and AIRM are required. The ORM category has drifted toward press releases, review solicitation, and takedown attempts because those are the surfaces easiest to name. The strategic problem I solve lives underneath — in the Page 1 SERP and AI answers returned for the professional’s name.
A damaging article ranking on the first page of Google does not need to be answered publicly. It needs to be outranked by owned properties, held across name-search keyword variations, and defended durably enough to survive algorithm shifts. That is search engine reputation management done through applied SEO discipline — the same mechanics I have applied to competitive commercial keyword rankings for twelve years, pointed at a different target.
See the case study →Four scenarios. Different work in each.
The online reputation situations I solve in SERPs fall into one of four distinct scenarios. The applied SEO discipline is consistent across all four. What changes is the starting inventory and the sequence of the work. Identifying which scenario applies is the diagnostic step that precedes any reputation management strategy.
No presence
Search results for the professional’s name are occupied by unrelated entities — other people, other businesses, unrelated content.
Foundational presence
Some digital footprint exists — a website, social profiles, scattered references — but not enough to hold Page 1.
Established, all positive
Page 1 is already held with no damaging coverage. Reputation management here is fortification against volatility.
Established, active negative
Damaging articles or coverage rank on Page 1. Systematic suppression through owned property architecture.
What’s inside scope.
- Documented baseline SERP capture across name and brand keyword variations.
- Owned property architecture — building, structuring, and optimizing the reputation assets that hold ranking positions.
- Content development targeting name-search keyword variations across the reputation architecture.
- Systematic negative SERP suppression through architectural depth.
- Reputation position defense across all name-search variations, monitored continuously.
- Volatility response when the SERP shifts.
- Weekly reporting against the live search results.
What’s outside scope.
- Crisis PR. A separate discipline. Applied SEO discipline addresses Page 1 architecture, not press response.
- Legal work. Removal, takedowns, and defamation questions belong on a lawyer’s surface.
- Paid review acquisition. Review platforms sit outside the reputation management search architecture covered here.
How my client engagements run.
Every engagement opens with a diagnostic — which of the four ORM scenarios applies to the name and brand, and what reachable keyword territory the applied SEO discipline works with. The reputation management strategy follows from the diagnostic. The project phase builds the property architecture and captures the baseline. Maintenance follows month-to-month.
Weekly reporting captures positions held across name-search variations, what moved during the week, and what was built. Quarterly review examines the arc of the engagement against the original diagnostic. Month-to-month terms — the reputation work continues because it earns the retention, and the authority to end the engagement stays with you at every month boundary.
Adjacent disciplines.
Online reputation management protects Page 1 of the name search. If competitive commercial keyword acquisition also matters — traffic-driving searches bringing new prospects to the practice — that is search engine optimization. If prospects research through ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, or other AI-mediated search before they ever reach Google, that is answer engine optimization.
Common questions professionals ask.
How long until the SERP moves?
Initial movement typically registers during the project phase. Durable position holding is the ongoing work of the maintenance phase. The case study documents the timeline on a live SERP for anyone who wants to see the pace of applied SEO discipline on active negative content suppression.
How does the four-scenario diagnostic shape the reputation management strategy?
Which scenario applies determines what gets built first, what gets defended, and what sequencing the reputation work follows. No presence and foundational presence scenarios require building the personal brand entity architecture from the ground up. Established presence with active negative content requires the systematic suppression work at architectural depth. Rare cases combine multiple scenarios and require both worked in parallel.
What happens if new negative content appears mid-engagement?
Continuous monitoring catches new content early. The defense architecture is already holding positions, so new entries fight uphill against owned properties with established authority. Volatility response is built into the maintenance phase of every reputation management engagement.
Does the online reputation hold if the engagement ends?
Positions built on owned properties with real ranking authority do not evaporate at the month boundary. Without continued maintenance, defense degrades against volatility over time. That is the reason the reputation management engagement is structured as project phase into maintenance phase rather than as a one-time build.
Browse the full FAQ →